Archive for April 2011

Jean Henderson: ‘forgotten’ Liberal candidate for Luton

You learn something new every day.

Liberal Democrat Voice’s series on ‘Forgotten Liberal Heroes’ has published a profile of Jean Henderson who, amongst many other things, was the Liberal candidate for the Luton constituency in the 1955 General Election.

EDL demo cost taxpayers nearly £2m

The local press are reporting that the policing of the EDL rally that was held in Luton earlier this year cost nearly £2m.

The good news is that the Home Office has agreed to reimburse Bedfordshire Police for the full costs. However, you can’t help thinking that the money would have been better spent elsewhere. It also doesn’t include the amount lost to shops and other businesses as a result of the town centre being virtually shut down for the day. Let’s hope that this is the last time these idiots hold such an event in the town.

I wrote about my experience on the day of the rally here.

Random Thoughts #3

My third edition of ‘Random Thoughts’ is about politics and the Liberal Democrats.

BBC News: Clegg advisor Norman Lamb could quit over NHS changes

I thought Norman Lamb’s interview on the Politics Show last Sunday was a superb piece of political communication. Norman was rational, moderate and even handed but at the same time made a strong political point with clarity and in language everyone can understand. What is more he demonstrated how what he was saying was rooted in principle and that he was prepared to back what his words with action. This is how to do it.

LDV: Let Clegg be Clegg (just not toooo much)

Stephen Tall is right on the money about the Cleggster.

Telegraph Blogs: Reports of the Lib Dems’ death have been greatly exaggerated

Julian Astle has some wise words about the circumstances the Liberal Democrats find themselves in. I agree with much of this.

“[Clegg's] party is already recasting its image in the public eye. In doing so, it is addressing important and long-standing brand weaknesses. It is making the difficult transition from the politics of protest to the politics of power, swapping public affection for public respect. The fact that the former takes less time to lose than the latter takes to win explains the party’s current malaise.”

Local elections in Luton

In just under a months time, on May 5th, the people of Luton will be going to the polls to elect councillors to represent them over the next four years.

I will again be a candidate for the Liberal Democrats in those elections. I will be standing in the Barnfield ward.

This is not the same ward that I have represented as a councillor for the last eight years. I was asked to move by the local party, who I think felt that a shake up and reordering  of the troops would be a good way of reinvigorating our team for the election campaign.

I originally had mixed feelings about this decision, but  it was the right one as I am enthusiastically embracing this new challenge. I am really enjoying working with my fellow candidate Martin Pantling and Barnfield is one of the most attractive parts of Luton sitting as it does under the southern end of the Galley and Warden Hills nature reserve. It also contains the Luton Sixth Form College where I studied many moons ago.

This is a really important election for Luton. Given the national situation and the severe financial constraints on local government, the new council will be making some really tough and difficult decisions. I think it will be critical to have a large Liberal Democrat group to bring some sense and proper rigour to those decisions.

Why the University of Bedfordshire should be thanking Vince Cable

Another thing that I wanted to write about that was in the news at the end of last month was something that demonstrated the impact that the Liberal Democrats are having in the coalition and something with direct consequences for Luton.

Immigration is one of the hottest political issues. Polls consistently show it as being one of the top concerns of the British public. So it was no surprise that a major part of the Conservatives pitch to the voters at the General Election last year was a pledge to reduce the number of new immigrants entering the UK. The Liberal Democrats as would be expected take a more ‘liberal’ approach to the issue, often stressing the importance of immigration to our economy. An approach which, although in general the right one, probably cost us at the election.

So within the coalition immigration is one of the areas of uneasiest compromise. The Home Office remains committed to a reduction in the number of immigrants but this is a  promise they are finding it difficult to meet in practice. A key part of the approach they are taking to do this is a clampdown on people entering the country on student visas.

While nobody could argue that action targeted at bogus colleges offering fake courses is a good thing, there was serious concern from the higher and further education sector that the more draconian parts of the governments original proposals would cause severe damage to college finances and have a negative impact on the wider economy. This article in The Economist gives a good summary of the issues and from it we learn that overseas students pump at least £10 billion a year into the economy and that every ten full-time university students from outside the EU create three full-time British jobs.

The Universities’ concerns about the impact of these measures were shared by Liberal Democrats in government including Nick Clegg and, in particular, Business Secretary Vince Cable. So it was good news that pressure from the Liberal Democrats resulted in the eventual policy announcement made at the end of March including several significant concessions. According to the Financial Times; “The compromise deal follows weeks of bruising negotiations between Home Office ministers and their counterparts at the business department.”

More on this from another Liberal Democrat involved in securing this deal can be found on Liberal Democrat Voice; ‘Julian Huppert writes… Winning the fight on student visas‘.

What struck me was how important this is to the economy of Luton. Now you may not think of Luton as a traditional university town, but the University of Bedfordshire, which has its main campus in the town centre, is a major provider of courses to foreign students. Hundreds of young people come to the town to study each year. I haven’t seen any actual figures, but it is safe to assume that they represent a substantial injection of cash into our economy.

So I wasn’t surprised when the Vice Chancellor of the University of Bedfordshire, Professor Les Ebdon, backed the Government’s rethink, saying;

“this announcement is a clear signal that the UK is still open for business. International students play a key role in the economy and here at Bedfordshire, they contribute millions of pounds to the local economy.”

It would have been nice if he had thanked the Lib Dems though!

From January 2009: Failing to get elected to the Federal Executive, twice

This is a blog post from Friday, 9 January 2009 that I published on my old Process Guy blog. It expressed my frustration at the rules around campaigning for internal party elections. Something that I have also recently written about.

I spent a lot of last year banging on about issues of internal party organisation within the Liberal Democrats on this blog and elsewhere. So much so that I decided that I ought to put my money where my mouth was and stand for election to the Federal Executive. So I did.

Read the rest of this entry »

The best of my Process Guy blog

Before I set up this blog at the end of 2009, my first attempt at blogging was a a blog I called ‘Process Guy’ that ran between September 2006 and March 2009. For archive purposes it can still be found at processguy.blogspot.com.

In the post I wrote yesterday about internal party election rules I referred back to something that I had written on my Process Guy blog. This reminded me that I have for some time been meaning to bring across some of the best posts from that blog and re-post them here. Well, I am strongly in favour of all kinds of recycling!

So I am going to start to try and do that. I’ve created a new category called ‘The Best of Process Guy‘ and in there I will post those articles from my old blog that I consider to be worth having another look at. And, where better to start than the post I mentioned yesterday.

Random Thoughts #2

Well it seems this series of ‘Random Thoughts’ is going to be erratic rather than regular. But still worth doing I think. So on with the second edition:

What the hell have the Lib Dems done?

Quite a bit, actually.

Nick Robinson’s The Prime Ministers

On Tuesday the BBC’s political editor begins his second Radio 4 series looking at British Prime Ministers starting with William Pitt the Younger. I hadn’t realised that the whole of the first series is available on iPlayer – handy as I missed it when it was on.

Sheryl Sandberg: Why we have too few women leaders

This powerful talk by the COO of Facebook gives pause for thought on the issue of the lack of women reaching the top in business and elsewhere.

Esther and the injury lawyers

It seems, according to Mark Valladares, that Esther Rantzen has gone from chasing votes in Luton South to chasing ambulances in Creeting St Peter.

Videos

If you missed the Liberal Democrat History Group’s meeting on reform of the House of Lords at the Spring conference, which I did, do not despair as the fascinating discussion is available online:

Finally, from the Yes to AV campaign launch:

 

Welcome changes to the Liberal Democrats internal election rules

There was a little bit of welcome news to do with the internal workings of the Liberal Democrats that I heard about recently. This was that the Party’s Federal Executive had agreed to support a series of proposals to relax the restrictions on campaigning in internal party elections. Mark Pack has more details on this over on Liberal Democrat Voice. In particular, I am very pleased that they are proposing to remove the, frankly ridiculous, ban on electronic campaigning.

Back in 2008 I stood, unsuccessfully, for the Federal Executive. I found it a frustrating process as, not being a member of the Party with a high profile, I was hindered by the campaigning tools I could most effectively use – email, websites and blogging – being off limits to me because of that ban on electronic campaigning. After the election I wrote a post on my old ‘Process Guy’ blog complaining about the situation and calling for the rules to be reviewed.

They were not and the most recent elections for the Party’s committees last year were also held under rules that prevented campaigning online. Although it was more noticeable that this time that more of the candidates were prepared to bend and break the rules with, seemingly, no consequences. The ban on online campaigning was one of the reasons, although to be honest not the most significant, why I chose not to try again to be elected to the FE.

The removal of the ban makes sense. Not only because it is impracticable, but also because I want the Liberal Democrats to have a healthy and vibrant internal democracy that encourages debate, challenge and accountability and the use of online communications is an essential method of encouraging that. So I hope the proposals will be supported when they come to conference for approval.

Update: I’ve recycled my Process Guy post from January 2009.

Lord Qurban Hussain’s maiden speech

Another thing I missed blogging about at the end of March was the maiden speech of the new Luton based Liberal Democrat peer Lord Qurban Hussain.

I blogged about Qurban’s introduction into the Lords back in January so it is only fitting that I follow up by recording his first contribution to their Lordship’s proceedings. In what I thought was an excellent first speech, Qurban contributed to a debate on the Government’s economic policies on Thursday 24th March.

The speech is available in the online Hansard but I’ve reproduced the full text below:

“My Lords, it gives me great pleasure to speak in your Lordships’ House for the first time. I am grateful to all the staff of this House for their kindness and help, and to noble Lords from all sides who have been so welcoming. My special thanks go to my introducing Peers, my noble friends Lord Rennard and Lady Hussein-Ece, who have been extremely helpful to me.

I might be one of very few Peers who have experienced migration in the early part of their lives. I arrived in the UK with my family from Kashmir at the age of 14 to join my father who was working in Rochdale in the textile industry. One Member of this House once said that his father got on his bike to look for a job; mine got on a plane.

I left school at 16 to work to help my family. I did a variety of jobs-anything that would pay a wage to support my family. I struggled through the new way of life with everything from culture to language, and from religion to the British weather, being very different from what I left behind.

Read the rest of this entry »